Difference between revisions of "Improve Identification and Data Collection for NAS"

From SAFE Solutions
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:
</div> </div> '''''See [[ZOOM_MAP_-_Expand_Steps_to_Minimize_Opioid_Use_During_Pregnancy_or_Pregnancy_during_Opioid_Use|Adopt Universal Screening for Pregnant Women]] for more information on standardized screening and testing for NAS'''''  
</div> </div> '''''See [[ZOOM_MAP_-_Expand_Steps_to_Minimize_Opioid_Use_During_Pregnancy_or_Pregnancy_during_Opioid_Use|Adopt Universal Screening for Pregnant Women]] for more information on standardized screening and testing for NAS'''''  
=Available Tools and Resources=
=Available Tools and Resources=
Oftentimes, there are already great resources in the field that have been developed, but they are not housed in a single place. Please use this section to share information about those resources and drive the reader to that resource. It may be a worksheet, toolkit, fact sheet, framework/model, infographic, new technology, etc. I suggest no more than 5 really good links and a corresponding description for the reader.  We also can use this section to highlight some of the great resources and programs at SAFE Project.  
 
'''Strengthening Health Agencies Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Surveillance Through Consensus vs. Driven Data Standards and Practices'''<ref>https://www.astho.org/globalassets/pdf/strengthening-health-agencies-nas-surveillance-through-consensus-driven-data-standards-practices.pdf</ref>The standards includes key considerations for health agencies that wish to improve NAS data collection and surveillance through the development of a registry.


=Promising Practices=
=Promising Practices=

Revision as of 06:57, 12 April 2022

Introductory Paragraph

One of the biggest challenges of addressing NAS is that it is not consistently identified, and collection of data and reporting is inconsistent.

Key Information

Relevant Research

Impactful Federal, State, and Local Policies

Indiana State Department of Health

In 2014, because of the high rate of opioid prescriptions, the Indiana General Assembly charged the Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) to: develop a standard clinical definition of NAS and a standardized process of identifying it, identify the resources hospitals need to do this, and then establish a voluntary pilot program with hospitals to implement this standardized NAS identification. As of 2016, 26 of 89 Indiana Birthing Hospitals are taking part in this pilot screening program . ISDH noted that universal screening in a non-punitive environment would allow us to understand the true prevalence of Perinatal Substance Use and NAS.[1]
 
The Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) established a Task Force which defined a standard clinical definition of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
  • The infant must:
  • Be symptomatic
  • Have two or three consecutive modified Finnegan scores equal to or greater than a total of 24
  • And have one of the following:
    • A positive toxicology test OR
    • A maternal history with a positive verbal screen or toxicology test

ISDH NAS Task Force Final Report:

NAS Identification Algorithm

See Adopt Universal Screening for Pregnant Women for more information on standardized screening and testing for NAS

Available Tools and Resources

Strengthening Health Agencies Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Surveillance Through Consensus vs. Driven Data Standards and Practices[1]The standards includes key considerations for health agencies that wish to improve NAS data collection and surveillance through the development of a registry.

Promising Practices

Please link to any best practice models or case studies that highlight creative/innovative or successful efforts in support of this strategy. Is there a community that does a really good job in this area that other communities should replicate? Please write a brief description and provide a link.

Sources


  1. [1]